IJDb ...Resources ...Community ...Search ... |
Promotional PhotoSteven Ragatz - 1st January, 1990.
Promo shots do not need to be literal images from an act or a show. Rather,
the single promo shot should communicate the essence of the performer and
give the viewer a taste of what the performance would feel like. In my
opinion, it should convey an emotional response, rather than an intellectual
one. Equally, the image should stand on it's own right. It can be
beautiful by itself, without ever committing to any actual reference to the
act or performer.
The literal information about an act can be conveyed with a video or an audition. Most juggling images loose all of their power in still photography. After all, it is nothing these days to take a picture and simply cut and paste objects around the juggler. The thing about juggling that is dramatically interesting is the motion and the risk, both of which are lost in a photograph. One way around this is to time-lapse the motion into a blur. This effect translates fairly well, but still does not do the action justice. Whether or not Oliver actually performs a balance with five balls, the image tells me a great deal about his act. I have never seen him perform, but judging from the image that you are referring to, I would guess that:
He is a juggler and works with balls, though not just tossing them These are just some impressions that I got when I saw the picture - a far richer image than that of someone slack-jawed, looking up at a bunch of balls in the air. Steven Ragatz view in thread mode or date mode post a new message |
| 0.02 seconds | |